TECHNOLOGY COLUMN
by Jackie Ordan
I was so excited. All summer I’d argued with my parents about the prospect of buying myself an iPhone. But to my parents, switching cell phone carriers seemed like too high a price to pay for what in my mind was the greatest idea since the wheel. The iPhone combined everything in life I love, into one; E-mail, cell phone, all on a Mac operating system. I was in heaven. Much to my shock, I was not able to win the argument with my parents, alas I would be stuck still with two clunkers in my pocket: a good old cell phone and an iPod.
Enter the mastermind of my holiday season wish-list: Steve Jobs. It seems he overheard my plight over the iPhone. Jobs, CEO of Apple Inc. always has the answer to every high tech problem I can think of. His solution to my dilemma: iPod touch. Cue disappointment.
The iPod touch has everything the iPhone has, except for the things that I wanted the most. It has an internal wi-fi capabilities so it can log onto any open network anywhere, but it does not have access to a universal network as the iPhone does. It can surf the web, but does not have an application dedicated solely. It seems like the iPod touch is a lacks most of the features that I want.
So now I don’t want an iPod touch. Surely Steve Jobs has something else up his sleeve. Bingo, iPod Classic (yet new) and iPod Nano. Stevie redeems himself with these winners. A new software interface gives a sleeker update to the one we have seen for quite some time now. This includes cover flow, which allows users to browse via albums and actually see the art from the album as they choose. With a sleeker design, these new iPods really seem great. The classic has 160 gigs of memory (that’s A LOT, in case you aren’t huge losers who know about gigs). Previous iPods maxed out at half that number. The iPod Classic is also much thinner than iPods we have seen and the iPod nano finally can play videos on its amazingly large screen for a product called ‘nano.’
Of course, as in all new pieces of technology, there are always a few flaws. Most of these complaints fall to the iPod nano. Your local geometry teacher can tell you why. The new nano does not follow the golden ratio of rectangles and thus looks ugly to people. It also does not have nearly the storage capacity of the classic. This is ironic because the big deal with the nano is that it can play videos- maybe it is in the fine print that the videos are going to take up all the space in no time.
Overall, I give Jobs and Company a C. In truth the grade would be much, much lower if it were not for the classic. Individually the grades break down as follows:
iPod Classic- A
o Tons of storage space, cool new software, thinner design. Only possible flaw is it remains to be seen if the product as enough RAM to sustain the cover flow software.
· iPod Touch- D
o Yes, touch screens are cool. Yes, the touch is cheaper than the iPhone. No, its not worth it. For a little more money you get many more features in buying an iPhone.
· iPod Nano- D
o It’s ugly. Not only that, but its lack of memory huge question mark. Why Apple decided to upgrade all of the software on the Nano without increasing the storage space is beyond me.